I am newly getting more vocal on here, but wanted to follow you. My granddaughter is autistic & would love to help her provided her parents will do the research and accept my help. I am willing to do another interview ( up to 5/6 ) thus far telling my story about my Father's Tragic Untimely Death - he was still a working man, unvaxxed, a Veteran & didn't have to be killed. I'll NEVER shut up....
The bigger picture is that unless the incentives, and they may include factors outside the immediate recompense to the hospitals, unless the incentive is removed, not only will the outcome continue, it will get worse.
The rhetoric of how "Nazi-like" those are who have perpetrated this mass democide (with a "c") is not going to work. Eugenics and euthanasia practiced by Germany during the National Socialist Party's regime may be something to detail, but the people doing all this are, in the most influential positions involved in this scheme, and in the main, either are Jews or are Zionists or affiliated with the power structures which are replete with those types and their agenda. There is no more room in anyone's stomach or in the intelligent minds of adults to carry one with the vilification of "NOTSEES" anymore. The shame of these people today is NOT that they are "like Nazis". It is simply the criminality of what they did.
THOSE THAT POISONED US globally WERE MOSTLY ITALIAN DECENT, CATHOLICS, Christian. Oddly, the LIST OF THE NON JEWISH ATHEISTS were the ones IN CHARGE
Dr Deborah Brix, Christian 1991: United States Department of Defense, Meritorious Service Medal, recombinant gp160 vaccine
UN run by Catholic António Guterres of Portugal
NY former Catholic Gov Cuomo, Catholic Pelosi, Biden, Kamala, CA Gov Newsom Catholic, Canada Justin Trudeau CATHOLIC, Australia Scott Morrison, Austria Alexander Van der Bellen,Italy Sergio Matarella, Germany Frank Walter Steinmeir, Bill Gates, Catholic Anthony Fauci, head of WHO Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Head of Los Angeles Health Dept Barbara Ferrer, NY Gov Hochul, NY Mayor Bill deBlasio, LA Mayor Eric Garcetti, Oregon Gov Kate Brown-bisexual
I'm well aware of the involvement of the people whom you listed. It doesn't detract from the point I made. In fact, nothing you said did, even when you used all caps. But it is clear that you simply aren't disposed to correcting your "We won the good war" myopia, as the propaganda runs too deep in most. For example, if I pointed out how many of the people in your list "just happened to be" Jewish, it would probably bounce off of you like a pebble off of a Sherman tank. These sorts of cases are hard to reverse, and make up huge swathes of even the more intelligent and educated of the populations. That so many Catholics are also involved only shows that there has been a long involvement of Catholics as well. In point of fact, this "odd bedfellow" phenomenon is not as odd or as new as you might think. It goes all the way back to the early 300s. Check into Codex Theodosianus for a glaring first recorded instance of it. They've been tied at the hip ever since. Did I mention Zionism doesn't require you to be Jewish, and that Jewish lobbies have most of those names you listed on a leash? At a certain point, you're going to have to be honest and admit that Germany lost the war, and that's the reason we have the world we have today. Blaming everyone on muh notsees is just getting old and lame in the face of the fact that it is 2024 and not 1934, and all the sweet and wonderful people who have had all this time to show that they expelled "the evil one" have only proven to be, as Patton said, the real enemies of peace.
Of course the unvaccinated were murdered. Anything to make the stats for those who got the jabs look better. That along with healthy user bias due to the jabs being withheld from those who were on death's doorstep, deemed too feeble to risk the side-effects.
Hypothetical illustration of how great a factor healthy user bias could be:
Group A: 100,000 person-years, 110 deaths
Group B: 100,000 person-years, 90 deaths
Looks like Group B did much better, right? Not so fast…
Say Group A included 10,000 individuals with very serious health conditions, 100 of whom died during the analyzed period, but only 1,000 of Group B were in comparably unhealthy condition, 60 of whom died during the analyzed period.
Then, among the healthy subsets, Group A had 10 deaths among 90,000 person-years, or 11.11 deaths per 100K person-years, as compared to Group B, which had 30 deaths among 99,000 person-years, or 30.30 deaths per 100K person-years, which is 2.73 times the Group A death rate.
Then, among the unhealthy subsets, Group A had 100 deaths among 10,000 person-years, or 1,000 deaths per 100K person-years, as compared to Group B, which had 60 deaths among 1,000 person-years, or 6,000 deaths per 100K person-years, which is 6 times the Group A death rate.
That is why it is very important to analyze cohorts of comparable characteristics prior to administration of the treatment in making assessments of safety and efficacy of the treatment.
In data analysis, a typical indicator of healthy user bias among populations of recipients for a treatment such as a vaccine that can cause adverse reactions, but does not offer immediate protection (typically regarded as 2 weeks for vaccine efficacy) is a below normal death rate among the recipients very soon after administration. Especially if the death rate increases over time to above normal levels.
Though sometimes the risk a treatment poses can be so great it statistically overwhelms healthy user bias, and an immediate spike of adverse events or even deaths is evident after administration. In such cases, that is a very serious safety signal.
One such example is the “clustering” of SIDS deaths soon after vaccination appointments in babies.
There is a big problem with vaccine effectiveness [the difference between the relative effectiveness rate (RRR) and the absolute effectiveness rate (ARR)].
Many doctors (and of course laypeople) do not understand the difference between absolute effectiveness rate and relative effectiveness rate (effectiveness rate as defined by the FDA, CDC and Pharmas).
For example, suppose there are 1 million people, and 1,000 of them become infected if none of them are vaccinated.
If all 1 million people are vaccinated and the number of infected people decreases to 100, the relative effectiveness rate (RRR) will be 90%.
However, even if none of them are vaccinated, 999,000 people will not be infected in the first place, so the absolute effectiveness rate (ARR) will be abt. 0.1%.
This ARR is the effectiveness rate that is meaningful to individuals.
The ARR is the average probability that an individual will not develop an infection if vaccinated. It is by no means the RRR.
There is a definition formula in the basics of medicine.
RRR≡(Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated) / Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo * 100 [%]
ARR≡ [1 - {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo / Total number of people who developed symptoms in placebo} / {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated / Total number of people who developed symptoms}] * 100 [%]
Of course, there are side effects, so if a large number of people who would not have been infected are vaccinated, even people who would not have experienced side effects in the first place will suffer from side effects.
In some cases, people who would not have been infected and would not have died will die from side effects.
In fact, even the fraudulent Pfizer Phase I clinical trial report from 2020 shows that the Sarscov2 non-infection rate is 99.962% for vaccinated people and 99.246% for unvaccinated people, meaning that the difference in infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated people is only 7 people per 1,000. This means that 993 people out of 1,000 people will be not infected regardless of whether they are vaccinated or not. It also shows that even if no one is vaccinated, the infection rate is about 8 people per 1,000. However, doctors and public health authorities who appear on TV only promote the relative effectiveness rate (RRR), and continue to mislead people into thinking that RRR is the probability that an individual can avoid infection. The reason for this is either that they are ignorant or that they are indirectly receiving money from pharmaceutical companies and intentionally selling the vaccine. Below are the results of my numerical calculations based on several clinical trial reports.
Pfizer's BNT162b2 ARR = 0.716%, RRR = 95% (but this is clearly a gene therapy drug)
Thank you. I had a friend who wanted to be in the drug trial for Gardasil. She was rejected because she already had 'antibodies'. She'd never had a symptom. The cause/effect relationship, purpose and significance of viruses, bacteria, antibodies and other blood artifacts are articles of faith in corporate science. My observation and opinion there.
All trial data is manipulated so even RRR is questionable. No govt has isolated any HPV so how do they make a vaccine for something they've never shown to exist? All vaccines are formulas containing toxic elements and therefore destructive to health.
Thank you for such a comprehensive article complete with key references! So sorry for the people murdered for not getting the vax... and it makes you wonder HOW hospitals could be so GOOD AT IT if it just started with Covid... they have perfected it. And it STILL GOES ON!
They weren't as obvious as they are now, maybe. All my departed relatives since the 70s were killed by medicals just doing their jobs. Most of the deaths I've seen over the last 20 years were plausible coincidences and 'mistakes were made' happenstance events when the medicals were involved. It made me think perhaps death is always an accident.
I am newly getting more vocal on here, but wanted to follow you. My granddaughter is autistic & would love to help her provided her parents will do the research and accept my help. I am willing to do another interview ( up to 5/6 ) thus far telling my story about my Father's Tragic Untimely Death - he was still a working man, unvaxxed, a Veteran & didn't have to be killed. I'll NEVER shut up....
This is why I avoid hospitals. I have zero trust in doctors.
The bigger picture is that unless the incentives, and they may include factors outside the immediate recompense to the hospitals, unless the incentive is removed, not only will the outcome continue, it will get worse.
The rhetoric of how "Nazi-like" those are who have perpetrated this mass democide (with a "c") is not going to work. Eugenics and euthanasia practiced by Germany during the National Socialist Party's regime may be something to detail, but the people doing all this are, in the most influential positions involved in this scheme, and in the main, either are Jews or are Zionists or affiliated with the power structures which are replete with those types and their agenda. There is no more room in anyone's stomach or in the intelligent minds of adults to carry one with the vilification of "NOTSEES" anymore. The shame of these people today is NOT that they are "like Nazis". It is simply the criminality of what they did.
THOSE THAT POISONED US globally WERE MOSTLY ITALIAN DECENT, CATHOLICS, Christian. Oddly, the LIST OF THE NON JEWISH ATHEISTS were the ones IN CHARGE
Dr Deborah Brix, Christian 1991: United States Department of Defense, Meritorious Service Medal, recombinant gp160 vaccine
UN run by Catholic António Guterres of Portugal
NY former Catholic Gov Cuomo, Catholic Pelosi, Biden, Kamala, CA Gov Newsom Catholic, Canada Justin Trudeau CATHOLIC, Australia Scott Morrison, Austria Alexander Van der Bellen,Italy Sergio Matarella, Germany Frank Walter Steinmeir, Bill Gates, Catholic Anthony Fauci, head of WHO Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Head of Los Angeles Health Dept Barbara Ferrer, NY Gov Hochul, NY Mayor Bill deBlasio, LA Mayor Eric Garcetti, Oregon Gov Kate Brown-bisexual
WHO
Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
WEF Chairman Professor Klaus Schwab
I'm well aware of the involvement of the people whom you listed. It doesn't detract from the point I made. In fact, nothing you said did, even when you used all caps. But it is clear that you simply aren't disposed to correcting your "We won the good war" myopia, as the propaganda runs too deep in most. For example, if I pointed out how many of the people in your list "just happened to be" Jewish, it would probably bounce off of you like a pebble off of a Sherman tank. These sorts of cases are hard to reverse, and make up huge swathes of even the more intelligent and educated of the populations. That so many Catholics are also involved only shows that there has been a long involvement of Catholics as well. In point of fact, this "odd bedfellow" phenomenon is not as odd or as new as you might think. It goes all the way back to the early 300s. Check into Codex Theodosianus for a glaring first recorded instance of it. They've been tied at the hip ever since. Did I mention Zionism doesn't require you to be Jewish, and that Jewish lobbies have most of those names you listed on a leash? At a certain point, you're going to have to be honest and admit that Germany lost the war, and that's the reason we have the world we have today. Blaming everyone on muh notsees is just getting old and lame in the face of the fact that it is 2024 and not 1934, and all the sweet and wonderful people who have had all this time to show that they expelled "the evil one" have only proven to be, as Patton said, the real enemies of peace.
Amazing how quick that guy shut up when you pointed that out.
God bless you sister.
You're absolutely right of course - great article, thank you!!!
Well, this absolute criminality culminates in the fact that there was NEVER a “virus”, everything was planned and deliberately initiated with fear,
https://www.healthline.com/health/nosophobia#symptoms
lies, manipulation and deceit to harm and kill!!!
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-b09
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-2a4
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-73e
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-6c4
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-781
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-20e
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-0a4
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-fba
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-0bf
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-554 etc. etc.
And blood money was enough to construct cases for a disease that never existed:
https://www.protocolkills.com/hospital-protocol
https://www.protocolkills.com/post/diane-s-story
https://web.archive.org/web/20211208124143/https://sgtreport.com/2021/11/pandemic-payoff-bill-gates-injected-319-million-into-mainstream-media/
Evil. People doing evil. All around.
Eric Clapton is on team reality. He never said that about the unvaxed. Brian May from Queen called Clapton a fruitcake for Eric's "antivax" opinions.
https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/music/a37232702/queen-brian-may-eric-clapton-fruitcake-covid-vaccine/
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-9875775/Queens-Brian-labels-hero-Eric-Clapton-fruitcake-anti-vaxxers.html
Christ help us. I watched for a while but was so angered I had to stop. Was close to blowing a gasket. Absolutely heart breaking.
Of course the unvaccinated were murdered. Anything to make the stats for those who got the jabs look better. That along with healthy user bias due to the jabs being withheld from those who were on death's doorstep, deemed too feeble to risk the side-effects.
Hypothetical illustration of how great a factor healthy user bias could be:
Group A: 100,000 person-years, 110 deaths
Group B: 100,000 person-years, 90 deaths
Looks like Group B did much better, right? Not so fast…
Say Group A included 10,000 individuals with very serious health conditions, 100 of whom died during the analyzed period, but only 1,000 of Group B were in comparably unhealthy condition, 60 of whom died during the analyzed period.
Then, among the healthy subsets, Group A had 10 deaths among 90,000 person-years, or 11.11 deaths per 100K person-years, as compared to Group B, which had 30 deaths among 99,000 person-years, or 30.30 deaths per 100K person-years, which is 2.73 times the Group A death rate.
Then, among the unhealthy subsets, Group A had 100 deaths among 10,000 person-years, or 1,000 deaths per 100K person-years, as compared to Group B, which had 60 deaths among 1,000 person-years, or 6,000 deaths per 100K person-years, which is 6 times the Group A death rate.
That is why it is very important to analyze cohorts of comparable characteristics prior to administration of the treatment in making assessments of safety and efficacy of the treatment.
In data analysis, a typical indicator of healthy user bias among populations of recipients for a treatment such as a vaccine that can cause adverse reactions, but does not offer immediate protection (typically regarded as 2 weeks for vaccine efficacy) is a below normal death rate among the recipients very soon after administration. Especially if the death rate increases over time to above normal levels.
Though sometimes the risk a treatment poses can be so great it statistically overwhelms healthy user bias, and an immediate spike of adverse events or even deaths is evident after administration. In such cases, that is a very serious safety signal.
One such example is the “clustering” of SIDS deaths soon after vaccination appointments in babies.
There is a big problem with vaccine effectiveness [the difference between the relative effectiveness rate (RRR) and the absolute effectiveness rate (ARR)].
Many doctors (and of course laypeople) do not understand the difference between absolute effectiveness rate and relative effectiveness rate (effectiveness rate as defined by the FDA, CDC and Pharmas).
For example, suppose there are 1 million people, and 1,000 of them become infected if none of them are vaccinated.
If all 1 million people are vaccinated and the number of infected people decreases to 100, the relative effectiveness rate (RRR) will be 90%.
However, even if none of them are vaccinated, 999,000 people will not be infected in the first place, so the absolute effectiveness rate (ARR) will be abt. 0.1%.
This ARR is the effectiveness rate that is meaningful to individuals.
The ARR is the average probability that an individual will not develop an infection if vaccinated. It is by no means the RRR.
There is a definition formula in the basics of medicine.
RRR≡(Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated) / Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo * 100 [%]
ARR≡ [1 - {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo / Total number of people who developed symptoms in placebo} / {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated / Total number of people who developed symptoms}] * 100 [%]
Calculation site https://bestpractice.bmj.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/how-to-calculate-risk/
Of course, there are side effects, so if a large number of people who would not have been infected are vaccinated, even people who would not have experienced side effects in the first place will suffer from side effects.
In some cases, people who would not have been infected and would not have died will die from side effects.
In fact, even the fraudulent Pfizer Phase I clinical trial report from 2020 shows that the Sarscov2 non-infection rate is 99.962% for vaccinated people and 99.246% for unvaccinated people, meaning that the difference in infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated people is only 7 people per 1,000. This means that 993 people out of 1,000 people will be not infected regardless of whether they are vaccinated or not. It also shows that even if no one is vaccinated, the infection rate is about 8 people per 1,000. However, doctors and public health authorities who appear on TV only promote the relative effectiveness rate (RRR), and continue to mislead people into thinking that RRR is the probability that an individual can avoid infection. The reason for this is either that they are ignorant or that they are indirectly receiving money from pharmaceutical companies and intentionally selling the vaccine. Below are the results of my numerical calculations based on several clinical trial reports.
Pfizer's BNT162b2 ARR = 0.716%, RRR = 95% (but this is clearly a gene therapy drug)
SK-Zooster (Shingrix) (shingles) ARR = 0.9%, RRR 94.2%
Meiji Replicon (Sarscov2) ARR = 0.5%, RRR = 95.5% (also a gene therapy drug)
Sequirus Flucelvax® Quad (for infulenza A, B) ARR = 17.5%, RRR = 51.9%
However, Placebo was administered meningococcal ACWY-vax instead of saline
In short, it was a fraudulent clinical trial, and all it says is that Flucelvax is more effective against influenza than ACWY-vax.
GSK's Arexvy (RSV) ARR = 0.26%, RRR = 82.5%
Moderna's mRNA-1345 (RSV) ARR = 0.53%, RRR = 68.4% (also a gene therapy drug)
Gardasil: HPV uninfected: ARR = 0.7%, RRR ≒ 50%
Gardasil: HPV already infected: ARR = 3.07%, RRR ≒ 70%
Gardasil contains the neurotoxin ALuminum at 416±75μg/dose
https://www.corvelva.it/speciale-corvelva/vaccinegate-en/metal-analysis-by-icp-ms.html
However, it is known that administering a vaccine for a disease when you are infected can actually be harmful.
In the case of Gardasil, you should be tested to see if you are already infected or not before administering it.
However, the authorities have not made this mandatory, and I feel they are being malicious.
Gardasil while infected is highly carcinogenic, so regular checkups and early surgery are best.
Thank you. I had a friend who wanted to be in the drug trial for Gardasil. She was rejected because she already had 'antibodies'. She'd never had a symptom. The cause/effect relationship, purpose and significance of viruses, bacteria, antibodies and other blood artifacts are articles of faith in corporate science. My observation and opinion there.
All trial data is manipulated so even RRR is questionable. No govt has isolated any HPV so how do they make a vaccine for something they've never shown to exist? All vaccines are formulas containing toxic elements and therefore destructive to health.
Thank you for this -:))
Such blatant criminality across an entire industry and the entire globe. It's mind boggling.
Hospitals are giant corporate entities.💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰 💰
be aware the pandemic treaty IS coming back for details check out the james roguski substack
Thank you for such a comprehensive article complete with key references! So sorry for the people murdered for not getting the vax... and it makes you wonder HOW hospitals could be so GOOD AT IT if it just started with Covid... they have perfected it. And it STILL GOES ON!
They weren't as obvious as they are now, maybe. All my departed relatives since the 70s were killed by medicals just doing their jobs. Most of the deaths I've seen over the last 20 years were plausible coincidences and 'mistakes were made' happenstance events when the medicals were involved. It made me think perhaps death is always an accident.
Hospitals and the medical mafia are not in the life saving or health business. They specialize in murder for profit.
Profiteering off ill health, for certain. If murder is what it takes...
Dr. JJ Couey has been saying this for some time....you should consider reaching out to him..... he is fighting the good fight....
https://gigaohmbiological.com/home
https://www.twitch.tv/gigaohmbiological
https://substack.com/@gigaohmbiological